

In his seminal and controversial book, "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering," Norman Finkelstein delivers a line that has become a cornerstone for challenging contemporary debates on ethics, history, and politics:
> “'Do not compare' is the mantra of moral blackmailers.”
This statement is not merely a provocative remark; it is the key to unlocking Finkelstein’s critique of what he terms the "Holocaust Industry." To understand his meaning, one must look at the core arguments presented in his book.
1. The Critique of "Exceptionalism"
At the heart of Finkelstein’s argument is a critique of "Holocaust Uniqueness" or "Exceptionalism"—the idea that the Holocaust stands outside of history and is incomparable to any other crime. He challenges the notion held by certain institutions and theorists that the Nazi genocide cannot be compared to American slavery, the genocide of Native Americans, or colonial atrocities in Africa.
Finkelstein argues that when we claim the suffering of one group is "incomparable" to any other, we inherently devalue the suffering of others. To him, while every genocide has its specific characteristics, comparison is the primary tool used by historians and social scientists to understand phenomena. To forbid comparison is to forbid critical thinking and analytical inquiry.
2. The Concept of "Moral Blackmail"
Why does Finkelstein use the term "blackmail"?
He contends that when a historical event is declared "sacred" and "incomparable," it is often weaponized as a political shield. According to Finkelstein, the "Holocaust Industry" exploits the real trauma of Nazi victims to:
* Silence criticism of current Israeli policies (by accusing critics of failing to grasp the "unique" depth of Jewish suffering).
* Demand special political or financial status from governments.
In practice, the mantra "do not compare" acts as a gag order. If a critic attempts to draw parallels between the plight of Palestinians and other historical injustices, the "moral blackmailer" immediately interjects: "How dare you compare this to the Holocaust?" This tactic shifts the conversation away from the merits of the critique and forces the critic to defend their "respect" for history. It is blackmail because it uses a past tragedy to stifle a living truth.
3. History vs. Ideology
Finkelstein distinguishes between "The Holocaust as History" and "The Holocaust as Ideology."
* History seeks to compare, find patterns, and learn lessons to prevent future atrocities.
* Ideology seeks a monopoly on suffering.
He argues that if the Holocaust is truly incomparable, it is effectively useless to humanity because no other event will ever "qualify" for its lessons. Conversely, if comparison is allowed, the Holocaust teaches us how to identify fascism, racism, and state-sponsored murder wherever they occur—whether the victims are Black, white, Jewish, Muslim, or atheist.
4. Defending the Universality of Human Suffering
Finkelstein’s ultimate goal is to assert that no group’s blood is "redder" than another's. In his book, he fiercely attacks those who use the Jewish suffering of World War II as a tool to ignore the suffering of others.
He suggests that those who prevent comparison are trying to establish a "hierarchy of suffering" with their own trauma at the apex. Finkelstein views this as an insult to the memory of actual Holocaust victims—including his own parents, who survived the Nazi camps. For Finkelstein, their suffering was a testament to the need for universal justice, not a license for political immunity for future crimes.
Conclusion
When Norman Finkelstein states that "do not compare" is the mantra of moral blackmailers, he is defending intellectual freedom and human equality. He encourages us to never allow a historical tragedy, no matter how immense, to be used as a tool to silence the human conscience in the face of modern injustices. In his view, the only way to truly honor the victims of the past is to make their suffering a benchmark for preventing the suffering of others through "courageous comparisons."